Multiple Sclerosis Pinched Vein Argument
First to anyone who can go to another country to get the procedure done: Canada’s tax law allows for the deduction of medical expenses even if those expenses were incurred out of the country and not a procedure covered by a provincial government, and people are now using this tax break because of the foolish stand of the provinces. Apparently the value of these tax breaks tend to be of a higher amount than the cost to taxpayers would have been for the provinces to just provide the service. I heard this report on the mainstream news channels, so at least some of you now have a choice. I’ve also recently heard via the mainstream news channels that blood circulation problems caused by heavy smoking increases the possibility of getting Alzheimer’s too. Don’t you just love the so called bureaucratic experts and scientists that are so clueless and uncaring, and our democratically elected government leaders who don’t need to have a clue about anything so are generally ignorant about the many important subjects that they have to make decisions about and who are generally extremely selfish and uncaring anyway?
The only arguments against opening the pinched veins of MS victims are based on money one way or another, or are coming from people who are extremely ignorant of even the most basic of our biological functioning.
One of the first things we learned about biology was the importance of the blood circulatory system to deliver oxygen and other needed supplies throughout the body and to deliver the poisons to the liver and kidneys to be disposed of from the body. Does anyone doubt that heart attacks and strokes are caused by blood flow blockages? Diabetics lose their legs due to bad blood flow problems. If oxygen can be cut off enough by blood flow reductions to main and kill then where is the great leap in logic to understand that the poisons that cannot get easily pass pinched veins to be disposed of from the body would build up to unsafe levels at those points and damage nearby cells? Our brains are basically like computers and the cells are the computer processing components used to collect and analyze sensory data and to send the signals to control our motor functions. Poisoning brain cells can result in their failure to operate correctly, or even to function at all, so will interfere with the ability of our brain and body to communicate and work properly.
Whether the diagnosis is MS or not, if pinched veins interfering with proper blood flow to or from the brain are found then opening those veins should be done to prevent any damage from being caused. Pretending you have a valid excuse to ignore this solidly proven biological understanding is not scientific but simply rhetoric for devious purposes. And pretending everyone must be cured to the same level if the veins are opened for it to be valid is just another lie to deceive because any recovery will be individualized based on several factors for poison recovery in humans and on how many cells were partially or permanently damaged. So if anyone wishes to slant the results against any testing then they will ensure they include only the most extreme cases so there will be little chance to get enough positive results so they can then drag things out even longer by saying they require more larger scale tests or they can just lay false claims against the concept if that is their wish.
Some liars are claiming that you can’t do it because you are experimenting on people, but not all vein opening processes are experimental as some are used regularly and our basic biological understanding informs us of the importance of the blood circulatory system working. Having this important system work without interference is extremely important for our bodies to be able to survive or to do anything. There is no moral validity to not provide this treatment right away, nor is there any real logical scientific reason not to. Pinched veins anywhere in the body should be opened to allow our blood circulatory system to function well enough to keep our bodies in proper operating condition and to prevent body damage starting. Preventive medicine is acknowledged to be the best procedure so why is it not being applied in all pinched vein cases? The people who do not want this process to be engaged in immediately are only concerned one way or another with money, or are extremely ignorant of even the most basic of our biological functioning.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Steven Hawkins says God not needed to create universe
Steven Hawkins says God was not necessary for the creation of the universe. He claims physics proves the big bang creation of the universe had to happen. Current understanding of physics proves no such thing and cannot even explain what happens in black holes or give mathematical proof to the Big Bang Theory!! Of course he also conveniently doesn’t try to explain where the stuff to create universes came from other than maybe from another universe, which came from another universe too of course; a circular reasoning of the pretend supporting itself and without any real beginning.
I guess Steven needs the money, and pretending to have proof that God isn’t needed so doesn’t exist is a way to get a lot of publicity and sell a lot of books to a larger audience than just the mathematicians, who would normally be the only people who would bother to buy a book he puts out. He probably figures he is so great that no one would dare to confront the fact that he chose to ignore the truth that our glorious theories of the physics that rule the universe break down when mathematicians try to apply those principles to situations like black holes and the big bang theory. Their belief that the speed of light is a constant that could under no circumstances change presents mathematical problems with the Big Bang theory so they simply make stuff up to get the math to work because they don’t wish to believe they are wrong in either of those theories.
In the past scientists played with math to try to explain away the observed celestial movements and keep their belief that the Earth was the center of the universe and everything circled it. Some people like to pretend the theory was forced on scientists by the Catholic Church but it was a theory believed in many nations outside of the church influence, because it is the nature of man to cater to his self-centeredness. It just happened to be a person living in a nation under the Roman Catholic power who was historically the first known person to give acceptable mathematical proof that the universe did not circle the Earth, so he encountered massive resistance and an attack from the church as well as the usual scientists who don’t like admitting being wrong.
The theory of black holes is that the gravity is so strong that even light cannot escape, and the Universe Big Bang Theory is that every bit of the universe was packed into an even smaller area then the massive black holes at the center of our galaxies and then exploded out against that extra super massive force of gravity for some reason. Maybe the stuff tore a hole from another universe and nothing had to obey the laws of physics at the beginning because this new universe didn’t exist previously so it hadn’t made up the rules yet, eh Steven?
It is easy to come up with theories if you choose to ignore the factors that won’t fit into your equation. Steven’s no-God theory conveniently doesn’t bother to explain where anything came from in the first place or how it compiled together or stayed together until it just decided to go bang and even then didn’t obey the known physics theories at the very beginning of the blast, just like Darwin’s delusional religion cannot give any mathematically plausible explanation of how life began without leaving out known factors that disprove it having any validity.
Finally, how can anyone present a valid theory of the universe that excludes the majority of what makes up the universe, which is Dark Matter, and with mathematical theories that fail under certain situations? That is like taking a few stones from the ground then claiming that you know everything the planet is composed of and how the planet and everything on it came into existence. A mathematician is just a computer doing math if he is incapable of himself knowing all the variables that must be included to reach valid conclusions. Sorry Steven but your supposed superior intellect and superior mathematical ability don’t impress me enough to cause me to suspend all intelligence and buy into your delusion.
I guess Steven needs the money, and pretending to have proof that God isn’t needed so doesn’t exist is a way to get a lot of publicity and sell a lot of books to a larger audience than just the mathematicians, who would normally be the only people who would bother to buy a book he puts out. He probably figures he is so great that no one would dare to confront the fact that he chose to ignore the truth that our glorious theories of the physics that rule the universe break down when mathematicians try to apply those principles to situations like black holes and the big bang theory. Their belief that the speed of light is a constant that could under no circumstances change presents mathematical problems with the Big Bang theory so they simply make stuff up to get the math to work because they don’t wish to believe they are wrong in either of those theories.
In the past scientists played with math to try to explain away the observed celestial movements and keep their belief that the Earth was the center of the universe and everything circled it. Some people like to pretend the theory was forced on scientists by the Catholic Church but it was a theory believed in many nations outside of the church influence, because it is the nature of man to cater to his self-centeredness. It just happened to be a person living in a nation under the Roman Catholic power who was historically the first known person to give acceptable mathematical proof that the universe did not circle the Earth, so he encountered massive resistance and an attack from the church as well as the usual scientists who don’t like admitting being wrong.
The theory of black holes is that the gravity is so strong that even light cannot escape, and the Universe Big Bang Theory is that every bit of the universe was packed into an even smaller area then the massive black holes at the center of our galaxies and then exploded out against that extra super massive force of gravity for some reason. Maybe the stuff tore a hole from another universe and nothing had to obey the laws of physics at the beginning because this new universe didn’t exist previously so it hadn’t made up the rules yet, eh Steven?
It is easy to come up with theories if you choose to ignore the factors that won’t fit into your equation. Steven’s no-God theory conveniently doesn’t bother to explain where anything came from in the first place or how it compiled together or stayed together until it just decided to go bang and even then didn’t obey the known physics theories at the very beginning of the blast, just like Darwin’s delusional religion cannot give any mathematically plausible explanation of how life began without leaving out known factors that disprove it having any validity.
Finally, how can anyone present a valid theory of the universe that excludes the majority of what makes up the universe, which is Dark Matter, and with mathematical theories that fail under certain situations? That is like taking a few stones from the ground then claiming that you know everything the planet is composed of and how the planet and everything on it came into existence. A mathematician is just a computer doing math if he is incapable of himself knowing all the variables that must be included to reach valid conclusions. Sorry Steven but your supposed superior intellect and superior mathematical ability don’t impress me enough to cause me to suspend all intelligence and buy into your delusion.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Haiti EarthQuake Relief Failure
The politicians are patting themselves and each other on the back as they pretend they have proven the kindness of the people of their countries by how their governments and government disaster agencies have responded to the earthquake in Haiti. They claim they have acted as quickly as anyone could under such circumstances and shown the great humanity of their people. And of course their meeting in Montreal resulted in only more empty words and vague promises for the future as they seek to exercise an even greater political and economic control over Haiti while also buying votes in their own countries with their pretense of acting humanly. Did they even put into action on the same day the collection and delivery of the 200,000 tents requested by the Haiti government as one of the people’s most pressing needs along with their need for clean water, food, and medical supplies?
And did you notice how quick the politician’s glorious pretense of humanity evaporated when it was suggested that Haiti’s debt be forgiven? Their excuse was that the WMF is worried about it being precedence setting, and we all know how important it is to not set a precedence of acting in a kindly manner instead of pursuing capitalist profits right? The people in those very same countries that had politicians attend the Montreal Event didn’t offer their money up as a loan but gave it willingly to help their fellow man in need, and still their politicians don’t get it. Haiti cannot even meet their interest payments now so their debt will only get larger and be an even greater yoke on the backs of the people as they try to rebuild their devastated country. This already was a poor country and the greedy capitalist system has received an opportunity to purchase the Haitians for their lifetimes and that of their children as well for a mere pittance. Slavery is not illegal but simply hidden within the capitalist structures, and we slaves even worship our corrupt political system that allows us to elect the selfish politicians who’ll casually sell even us into slavery for their own short term political gain.
Two weeks after the earthquake and all those countries leaders have not even managed to get enough water, food, medical supplies, or even tents for the displaced people into Haiti. They knew the extent of the disaster within hours but failed miserably to properly address the situation (just another Katrina type response failure). Is it that the great democracies can’t seem to find the goods to purchase, or is it that their chosen leaders once again failed miserably to plan in advance for the realities of catastrophic event happenings and were too busy playing politics afterwards to get the job done? Engaging in political media shows instead of working to make sure the right things were done right away exasperated the extent of suffering and increased the number of dead and maimed to basically increase the overall human and even financial costs of the disaster.
Catastrophic events happen all the time and our politicians are over five years old so must have been around during at least a few of them to know this fact. Politicians usually ignore planning in advance to instead only react when things happen, and even then they’ll spend more time trying to figure out how they can benefit politically then how to properly address the problem. How quickly they got together to plan and implement a high security political-show meeting of country leaders to plan the reconstruction of Haiti. They even engaged in the politics of arguing over using the word reconstruction, claiming it might be construed as to meaning recreating the status quo. Those political morons seem to think they have all the time in the world so they can even waste it whining about how someone might interpret a word. After all, they and their families are not the ones suffering from a lack of water or food, medical help, or having to live without even a tent for shelter. And I am sure they enjoyed first class suites and meals in Montreal while they worked to divvy up the political and capitalist gains they could achieve from the suffering of their fellow man.
Don’t expect the truth to come from some of the bigger disaster relief organizations concerning what could or could not have been achieved either, partly because they rely on governments for a lot of their funding and goodwill, but also because many of them were too busy planning and setting up their own personal long term distribution company plans instead of first addressing getting as many supplies out to as many areas and people of the country as quickly as possible. There is a lot of money involved in the long term projects and their company executives are ruled by capitalism even though the companies have a charity business structure, and they don’t want to give up any control over their resources least they lose some of their piece of the large financial pie. They’ll babble about how they have experience so are the experts and should be in charge to grab as much control as possible then of course they’ll claim their need for more money, and larger salaries for the executives who are then controlling more money of course. For example, some people had to bypass them by bringing in and then themselves delivering their own donations to locations in the country, even in order to get medical supplies to a hospital that was just outside of the main airport that was being used while the relief organizations at that airport had plenty of supplies sitting around being organized for a dribbling out eventual distribution (In the year 2525, if man is still alive). There is a difference in the type of material delivery assistance response that is needed right away after a large scale disaster like that experienced in Haiti and the type of assistance delivery that will be needed for the longer term. Diddling around organizing for the long term instead of addressing the fact that people are suffering and dying now is not charitable. Were they afraid they might run out of supplies at their airport depot and then maybe lose their high media viably space so chose to instead allow hospitals to run out of supplies, or maybe they wanted to put on a show for the media of having a big “organized” operation underway?
Do you think the next big disaster will be handled any differently by our governments, or will they once again prove that while they will plan for war to take people’s lives by stocking the necessary weapons and supplies and training personnel for such events they are not interested in doing any more then a mere pittance of planning to save people’s lives? When your own country suffers a severe disaster, or another one, you better hope that it is the only one going on in the world at the time because even with help from the rest of the world the proof from the Katrina and Haiti responses is that the people will suffer needlessly excessively and for far too long.
And did you notice how quick the politician’s glorious pretense of humanity evaporated when it was suggested that Haiti’s debt be forgiven? Their excuse was that the WMF is worried about it being precedence setting, and we all know how important it is to not set a precedence of acting in a kindly manner instead of pursuing capitalist profits right? The people in those very same countries that had politicians attend the Montreal Event didn’t offer their money up as a loan but gave it willingly to help their fellow man in need, and still their politicians don’t get it. Haiti cannot even meet their interest payments now so their debt will only get larger and be an even greater yoke on the backs of the people as they try to rebuild their devastated country. This already was a poor country and the greedy capitalist system has received an opportunity to purchase the Haitians for their lifetimes and that of their children as well for a mere pittance. Slavery is not illegal but simply hidden within the capitalist structures, and we slaves even worship our corrupt political system that allows us to elect the selfish politicians who’ll casually sell even us into slavery for their own short term political gain.
Two weeks after the earthquake and all those countries leaders have not even managed to get enough water, food, medical supplies, or even tents for the displaced people into Haiti. They knew the extent of the disaster within hours but failed miserably to properly address the situation (just another Katrina type response failure). Is it that the great democracies can’t seem to find the goods to purchase, or is it that their chosen leaders once again failed miserably to plan in advance for the realities of catastrophic event happenings and were too busy playing politics afterwards to get the job done? Engaging in political media shows instead of working to make sure the right things were done right away exasperated the extent of suffering and increased the number of dead and maimed to basically increase the overall human and even financial costs of the disaster.
Catastrophic events happen all the time and our politicians are over five years old so must have been around during at least a few of them to know this fact. Politicians usually ignore planning in advance to instead only react when things happen, and even then they’ll spend more time trying to figure out how they can benefit politically then how to properly address the problem. How quickly they got together to plan and implement a high security political-show meeting of country leaders to plan the reconstruction of Haiti. They even engaged in the politics of arguing over using the word reconstruction, claiming it might be construed as to meaning recreating the status quo. Those political morons seem to think they have all the time in the world so they can even waste it whining about how someone might interpret a word. After all, they and their families are not the ones suffering from a lack of water or food, medical help, or having to live without even a tent for shelter. And I am sure they enjoyed first class suites and meals in Montreal while they worked to divvy up the political and capitalist gains they could achieve from the suffering of their fellow man.
Don’t expect the truth to come from some of the bigger disaster relief organizations concerning what could or could not have been achieved either, partly because they rely on governments for a lot of their funding and goodwill, but also because many of them were too busy planning and setting up their own personal long term distribution company plans instead of first addressing getting as many supplies out to as many areas and people of the country as quickly as possible. There is a lot of money involved in the long term projects and their company executives are ruled by capitalism even though the companies have a charity business structure, and they don’t want to give up any control over their resources least they lose some of their piece of the large financial pie. They’ll babble about how they have experience so are the experts and should be in charge to grab as much control as possible then of course they’ll claim their need for more money, and larger salaries for the executives who are then controlling more money of course. For example, some people had to bypass them by bringing in and then themselves delivering their own donations to locations in the country, even in order to get medical supplies to a hospital that was just outside of the main airport that was being used while the relief organizations at that airport had plenty of supplies sitting around being organized for a dribbling out eventual distribution (In the year 2525, if man is still alive). There is a difference in the type of material delivery assistance response that is needed right away after a large scale disaster like that experienced in Haiti and the type of assistance delivery that will be needed for the longer term. Diddling around organizing for the long term instead of addressing the fact that people are suffering and dying now is not charitable. Were they afraid they might run out of supplies at their airport depot and then maybe lose their high media viably space so chose to instead allow hospitals to run out of supplies, or maybe they wanted to put on a show for the media of having a big “organized” operation underway?
Do you think the next big disaster will be handled any differently by our governments, or will they once again prove that while they will plan for war to take people’s lives by stocking the necessary weapons and supplies and training personnel for such events they are not interested in doing any more then a mere pittance of planning to save people’s lives? When your own country suffers a severe disaster, or another one, you better hope that it is the only one going on in the world at the time because even with help from the rest of the world the proof from the Katrina and Haiti responses is that the people will suffer needlessly excessively and for far too long.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)